THE (Ruislip) Lido is an asset to the community in every way, providing an area for all sorts of recreational activities and a beautiful place to relax in the summer, and it should absolutely not be left to fall into disrepair.
A modernised facility with a revitalised railway and improved boating, fishing and swimming area would bring the community together and really give the area something to be proud of, and that is something that any Hillingdon resident should be thrilled about.
There are often complaints, from both adults and youths, about the lack of spending on, and facilities for, recreational use, so why should we turn down a brilliant opportunity that is being handed to us?
I also recognise the grievances of those supporting the petition to prevent the development. However, I am realistic in believing that 'Disneyland' won't spring up, and also think there is no reason why the proposals can't go ahead alongside the protection and enhancement of the woodland area.
Personally I enjoy having the woods to bike and jog through, and I'm sure that many others also appreciate them, but I think it is entirely possible to improve other aspects while maintaining the natural features.
All it takes is some consideration during the planning and building phases and the fragile wildlife can be preserved. After recognising this, perhaps the organisers of the petition would realise that their time is better spent working in co-operation with the council to ensure that the proposals are sound and responsible in terms of considering the environmental and wildlife aspects, rather than failing to realise the suitable way to ensure greater good for all stakeholders.
On the anti-social behaviour note, is it not true that far more yobbish behaviour takes place in unlit, unpopulated, run-down areas than modern, respected and valued areas equipped with CCTV and a few working lights?
On a much larger scale, on recovery from economic downturn, would such a large project not be extremely beneficial to the local economy, employing many locals not only in the construction phase but also through employment in the new facilities?
On a final note, perhaps if the survey was carried out on a much larger scale, not only of existing users but of potential users of the new facilities, and also not weighted in favour of those residing near to the lido - who take a Nimby view - would the results not be overwhelmingly in favour?
CHARLIE RICHIARDI Via ruislip.uxbridgegazette.co.uk
